A vodka company created a nationalist advertisement for the Mexican marketplace. The internets allowed an American audience to gaze upon said advertisement. And voila! An opportunity for anxiety, anger and shock to pour out on the different sides of all the issues our neighbor to the South conjures up: the growth of the Latino population, illegal immigration concerns, imperialism, the presence of the Spanish language in public square and so on.
I certainly dread the idiotic conflations that seem to be dominating the side boycotting the vodka company. Conflations such as confusing Latin America with Mexico. Or arguing that American Latinos are essentially an un-meltable mass of recent arrivals somehow magically coordinating to take back the Southwest for the Mexican government (I guess I didn’t get that memo.) And ultimately, I am just not persuaded that a liquor-selling multinational thinks enhanced profitability will result from actually fomenting a war or domestic revolt in the world’s largest economy. They care about $, as they should.
Unfortunately, the focus on the identity politics overlooks a more subtly wicked element of the advertisement.
There is something utterly disingenuous about a Swedish vodka brand playing on Mexican nationalism with an ad that features English copy (!). I mean come on, does the company really care about the aspirations of the average Mexican citizen? I sincerely doubt it. They do care about sales, though. Sure, the add is tongue-in-cheek and we should have a sense of humor about it. But there is definitely something unappealing about a corporation exploiting the real resentments present in developing country as a way of establishing brand appeal. It’s socially irresponsible given that there are many other ways to establish that appeal and provide healthy return to investors without relying on mobilizing nationalism. It is particularly disappointing given that this same brand has featured exciting and innovative creative in the past. I don’t like it when American truck makers deploy nationalism to cover-up for sub-par products. It just wreaks of a company getting defeated in the marketplace. So it’s unfortunate that brands sometimes choose that set of emotions to manipulate, especially since I doubt it is rarely the optimal path by which to enhance brand equity or profitability.
Specifically, a lot of the people in their target Mexican market are wary, tired, and suspicious of the use of nationalism. Let’s not forget that until recently, Mexico was ruled by an authoritarian oligarchy that often used nationalist sentiments to deflect corruption and policy failures. It just seems like an ad a PRIista would have conjured up in the late 80s. As you can tell, my initial reaction to it was that it was a clumsy and manipulative attempt at street cred.
And maybe there is a lesson here for how we engage Americans concerned about immigration (of all kinds) because of their dwindling economic fortunes…we should shift the conversation from emotional identity politics and talk about how (1) we create institutional arrangements that fairly share the prosperity created by existing corporations, as well as (2) further enhance access to capital to facilitate competition, especially against disingenuous multinationals that have to rely on base emotion because of sub-par products.
UPDATE: The vodka company apologizes.


20 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 6, 2008 at 1:33 pm
Rob
I saw this ad in Mexico City a few weeks ago and thought it was quite funny, as did my Mexican and Latino friends. Really a great ad. The reaction from some “Gringos” as well as Julio is real immature.
April 6, 2008 at 2:49 pm
Neil
I agree. It is so stupid. Mexicans understand the border is not going to change. Integration and assimilation is the only way forward to maximize their opportunity in America. i am glad that so many of my hispanic friends understand that and are beginning to become loyal to the American experience and are speaking engilish.
April 6, 2008 at 2:54 pm
JB
Oh please, how about an ad called absolut US that had all of Canada and Mexico as parts of the US? Would it be “quite funny”? The shoe doesn’t fit as well when it’s on the other foot.
A better name would have been absolut native or absolut Spain. They have more claim to the land than Mexico does.
April 6, 2008 at 4:00 pm
pat
But wasn’t that once actually the border? To say that it’s all about immigration or identity politics is only partly true. It is also about history. An no Absolut Spain is wrong, as most of this territory became part of the US long after Mexican independence from Spain.
April 6, 2008 at 4:19 pm
Colin
Julio is right. If anything, the ad mocks Mexican nationalism by treating it as a matter for liquor-ad irony.
But the U.S. controversy is testimony to how many people are walking around with chips on their shoulders.
I say we party like it’s 1844.
April 6, 2008 at 4:27 pm
Esther
It was indeed the border. USAers need to be reminded of that fact.
April 6, 2008 at 4:50 pm
radtop
I can hardly believe you didn’t get the message. Reconquista is a pretty well known movement in liberal and hispanic circles.
April 6, 2008 at 5:03 pm
Brandon
I saw this billboard in Mexico City just a few days ago, and as a white American thought it was funny and even took a picture of it. People are just too sensitive! Its just an ad!
April 6, 2008 at 8:43 pm
Anonymous
This is a historically accurate map of Mexico’s borders at one point in history (~1840?).
April 6, 2008 at 9:20 pm
Neil
Yes anonymous, it once wWAS a map. Mexicans just need to get over it and accept the reality. To be honest they need to “reconquista” their own corrupt government before they try to tackle redrawing lines on a map they have no chance of regaining. But it’s just an ad, so everybody should relax.
April 6, 2008 at 10:28 pm
Historybuff
As a Latina, I thought it was funny! But more importantly, thanks to Absolut, a possible history lesson… Maybe Americans of all races are asking questions: Why did they draw the map this way? Maybe I should do some research into what the joke is, etc
April 7, 2008 at 4:10 am
Jack
What’s next to push the envelope for bad taste? An “Absolut World” ad showing Tibet being independent from China?
April 7, 2008 at 9:49 am
Ted B. (Charging Rhino)
Well, Absolut’s insidious plan has failed. I’ve poured the last of our household’s Absolut down the drain and am restocking with Grey Goose. I don’t do business with stupis marketeers who purposefully offend me.
April 7, 2008 at 11:06 am
Anonymous
Why not make it Spain? idiots
April 7, 2008 at 12:47 pm
Anonymous
One reconquista group is called Aztlan, and they advocate variations on this theme. But does anyone doubt that the real strategy of Absolut was to get US press attention? And – congrats – they got la madre of all press attn: Drudge.
April 7, 2008 at 2:05 pm
Anonymous
I find it ironic that some are chuckling about how maybe people will learn that the borders were once drawn this way when, in fact, this “map” isn’t even historically accurate. For starters, ask yourselves, where’s Oregon? Then go look at a real map. This one is just a sloppy drawing meant to push booze on an appeal to historical and geographical ignorance, to say nothing of tacky, nationalist machismo.
April 9, 2008 at 4:52 pm
Jorge
Why all the fuss about this add and the American “nationalism” emerging. Do those natinalists know the history behind all that Mexican territory changing countries “ownership”? If they knew it , perhaps their offended sentiments will not be so alarming once they educate themselves a little bit of the true history behind this issue.
April 10, 2008 at 5:14 pm
Alamo
“Reconquista is a pretty well known movement in liberal and hispanic circles.”
God must love idiots. He made so many of them. I’m referring to the author of the comment, not to liberals or hispanics, who apparently in the commentator’s mind form monolithic circles conspiring to restore old Mejico.
I notice the bottle covers the area of Belize. I wonder if that was intentional.
April 26, 2008 at 12:52 pm
Tom
To me the perfect accessory to a drink with friends is a healthy political/historical debate?
While I feel that Absolut may have handled this slightly better in some ways (http://www.tomhcanderson.com/2008/04/26/absolut-vodka-gets-c-in-handling-web-20-pr-fiasco/), overall, and in the end I suspect the net-net may even be a slight uptick in sales. (possibly a slight decrease in US; but if they play it right the controversy could be leveraged in other global markets with a positive effect.)
TA
April 30, 2008 at 10:41 am
Kai
As a Chinese whose government “supposedly” used “dubious” historical basis to deny the Tibetan secessionists the right to independence, I strongly support the right of Texas, California and other states that were illegally seized from Mexico with violent means to break from the United States, either returning to Mexico or becoming independent. As a matter of fact, I think our compatriots, who the West believe should be more politically-active, should actively support the cause of the above-mentioned states to gain independence, and will condemn any brutal means the US might be resort to “crack-down” on the secessionists in the name of maintaining law and order.